That is extremely common practice.So I think using a hybrid approach of sandable/filler primer + CWF might be a great combination with certain body tubes to deal with both as efficiently as possible.
Yeah, I thought I saw him talking about using both before, but me being lazy, I hoped I could get satisfactory results with just one of the techniques.That is extremely common practice.
If you haven’t already done so I highly recommend reading @hcmbanjo ’s blog (http://modelrocketbuilding.blogspot.com/) where he show this process very clearly.
I hate sanding filler/primer but it is so darned effective that I usually just suck it up and deal with it.
Sometimes you can get by with only one. For my current build the tubes have very minimal grooves, so I'm just doing filler/primer without the CWF step. Some folks always just do it with the filler/primer, sometimes using several coats.Yeah, I thought I saw him talking about using both before, but me being lazy, I hoped I could get satisfactory results with just one of the techniques.
That's what I had been doing. But if I have to choose between 1 filler/primer coat and 1 application of CWF, or 3 primer/filler coats, I choose the former.Some folks always just do it with the filler/primer, sometimes using several coats.
Oh, wait! There are already pictures of the "Gnome-Hawk" Frankenrocket in this thread on TRF:I will take a picture of it when I get back into town and then post it here. It also has a Quest Big Rage payload bay on top, to give it a bit of a extra length for stability, IIRC. A true “Frankenrocket”.
Oh, wait! There are already pictures of the "Gnome-Hawk" Frankenrocket in this thread on TRF:
https://www.rocketryforum.com/threads/tube-coupler-hack.172910/
Here are couple more I found on my phone:
View attachment 575951
View attachment 575952
For @CoolRockets
I should calarify. The Quest Big Rage "payload bay" is not the payload bay from the Big Rage. It is just an intact piece of pre-colored body tube from a crashed Quest Big Rage.
Here's a good example of a two-step seam filling process:
https://modelrocketbuilding.blogspot.com/2021/09/estes-super-mars-snooper-7309-build_16.html
Step 1. Sometimes I draw a line down the spirals with a mechanical pencil before filling. It makes the spiral easier to see.
Using an older blade to direct the filler into the seams, no bubbles or gaps.
Two steps, no visible spirals.
Step 2. I've used every filler/primer out there - the best is the Duplicolor Filler Primer #FP101.
Over the years, I've ended up using the same mix ratio for both the fins and body tube spirals.@hcmbanjo, I tried posting directly on your blog, but it wouldn't let me, for some reason.
https://modelrocketbuilding.blogspot.com/2011/11/cwf-filler-mix-ratio-for-body-tube.html
What is the mix ratio you're using for spirals these days? In that post, you only say it's "thicker" than the 2 1/2 : 1 you use for fins. Do you have a number?
The godson is looking to do filler on his Crossfire ISX.
My best finishes come from applying clear coat after paint and decals, followed by sanding with 1000+ grit wet sandpaper, then re-applying clear coat.
The above.Just started using Acryli-Quik and noticed that it is not as smooth as I would like.
What steps should I take after the wet coat? Looking for advice to make it smooth and shiny enough for decals.
Thanks for any insights.
Something that might make this easier would be using vinyl/electrical tape. Also use @neil_w ‘s idea of sticking the tape to something else a view times to prevent it from being TOO sticking. Vinyl tape is one of the few cheap and easily available tapes that easily deform to make a true helical ribbon. Standard tapes will require either multiple cuts or overlaps.Once smeared with a razor, it looks like this
View attachment 575271
Here are the results
View attachment 575272
After sanding with 400 grit (I prefer 400 grit on CWF as it is less abrasive on the tube, I use 220 on primers / fillers) it looks like this
View attachment 575273
Enter your email address to join: