With ducting a long way you have a nice colum of cold, compressed gas to pop the laundry out. No recovery wadding needed just like the Flis Kit Boreallis and Night Whisperer.
I once read a caption under a photo of a rocket that kinda looks like yours in a highly respected model rocket handbook that stated widely spaced pods were bad rocket design. Always worked for me though. Maybe time to do something even a bit more stupid? I like sports scale warbirds and this AR 234 flew on two widely spaced D12's. A real RSO frightening machine but with a nice long rod all the sin equaled out by the time it left the rod. Chutes tightly packed in the engine nacelles and had a flame decoration on the motor casing hanging out the back to make it look good; the most important element. Lots of greebles to equalize drag. The cockpit was shaped epoxy clay for copious amounts of stinking nose weight.
View attachment 621009View attachment 621008
Check out my threads Albatross DV, JU 87 Stuka, Beech Staggerwing, P61 Black Widow, Reggiane 2005 for mid cant cluster warbird fun.Thanks - those are great to see... I have been wondering about putting mid-body / traction motors into side-mounted motor pods to duplicate a number of scale models out there.
How does the position of thrust affect aerodynamics? Obviously it pushes the CG forward. However, I would assume that traction motors also change the way a plane flies but I don't think that simulation software takes that into account.
Enter your email address to join: