- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 11,705
- Reaction score
- 6,369
Sometimes less is more.
Yes, just three fins and nose cone. No chute, no streamer, it’s gonna be backslide or nothing.
For safety purposes this weighs only 20.8 grams with and expended motor casing, and it uses a Nerf Dart for a nose cone.
I usually launch in pretty isolated surroundings, so chances of fecoturbine interaction are minimized.
Length is 72 cm, with body diameter 1.38 c, gives me a length to diameter of 52.
It is a near downs scale from the Peter Alway model, down from BT-20 to Bt-5.
I didn’t downscale the fins as much, they should be 1.1 inches, I am at 1.25 (sorry for metric and standard mixing.)
The MAJOR difference is the fins position. Instead of evenly spaced at 120 Degrees, they are symmetrical but with a DORSAL dihedral of the VENTRAL fins. I fully expect this to corkscrew on boost, the hope is that the forward ejection port unilateral “puff” will throw this into a backslide, AND the fin position will determine the designated ventral side will indeed be ventral.
Among the challenges for both Horizontal Spin and Back Slider recover is fin damage on landing.
We will see. In any case I have always wanted to use the name Ghost Rider for a rocket, so now I can check that off!
Yes, just three fins and nose cone. No chute, no streamer, it’s gonna be backslide or nothing.
For safety purposes this weighs only 20.8 grams with and expended motor casing, and it uses a Nerf Dart for a nose cone.
I usually launch in pretty isolated surroundings, so chances of fecoturbine interaction are minimized.
Length is 72 cm, with body diameter 1.38 c, gives me a length to diameter of 52.
It is a near downs scale from the Peter Alway model, down from BT-20 to Bt-5.
I didn’t downscale the fins as much, they should be 1.1 inches, I am at 1.25 (sorry for metric and standard mixing.)
The MAJOR difference is the fins position. Instead of evenly spaced at 120 Degrees, they are symmetrical but with a DORSAL dihedral of the VENTRAL fins. I fully expect this to corkscrew on boost, the hope is that the forward ejection port unilateral “puff” will throw this into a backslide, AND the fin position will determine the designated ventral side will indeed be ventral.
Among the challenges for both Horizontal Spin and Back Slider recover is fin damage on landing.
We will see. In any case I have always wanted to use the name Ghost Rider for a rocket, so now I can check that off!
Last edited: