Obviously it needs a couple of mounting holes, and some of the edges might need to be radiused or broken.
Or just glue it on the surface.
Obviously it needs a couple of mounting holes, and some of the edges might need to be radiused or broken.
It would probably need a bit more surface against the tube, or maybe a reinforced area of the tube if it was cardboard. And it would have to be a material that glued well with an ordinary sort of epoxy.Or just glue it on the surface.
Suggest putting a radius on those inside corners to avoid stress concentration. Also, is there an alignment feature on the bottom to keep it pointed the right way? Looks fine otherwise.For giggles I did a quick OpenSCAD version. (attached) Enjoy!
View attachment 644470
It looks cool, but I don't think I trust my 3D printing abilities to create one that I felt was safe for flying.
This is a fun thread! I'm really liking all of the different ideas that have been presented.
Generally, I'm not worried too much about ultimate performance of my rockets, so "regular" rail guides are fine for most of my stuff. Like I said I gravitate toward "scale" looks. But one of the things that makes rocketry so much fun are the innumerable little problems to solve, and the innumerable ways to solve them.
I have a potential project I'm considering that would present some real challenges as far as getting it on a rail for launch. It would be a high power scale model of the Sprint missile, which is completely conical (pic below). I have a few ideas (none that I really like), but I would really love to see what you guys might come up with! I don't want to hijack this thread, so I'll start a new one over in high power.
On second thought, I'll post it here in the Rocketry Watering Hole...
Would be very interested in a brain-storming session. Any and all ideas welcome!
It would probably need a bit more surface against the tube, or maybe a reinforced area of the tube if it was cardboard. And it would have to be a material that glued well with an ordinary sort of epoxy.
The issue with many prints is they shrink as they cool.You printed a set of mine? If you don't want to file them down, I could always modify the model for a bit more clearance. I think I used .010" all around. I don't actually know much about 3D printing tolerances, different processes, etc. I worked from a profile picked up from a 3D model of a rail I downloaded., and allowed, if I recall correctly, .010" between my part and the rail. It could easily be changed to .020".
What first comes to my [less-experienced-than-some-guys'-] mind is a sealed tubular structure (metal? [reinforced] plywood? fiberglass?) at a fixed, parallel distance from the central axis of the airframe, therefore entering/inserting into the aft centering ring and exiting from the lateral aspect/exterior of the airframe (this orifice could be covered during flight and/or display via a hinged flap) accommodating either a large rod or a rail, using buttons or guides internally.This is a fun thread! I'm really liking all of the different ideas that have been presented.
Generally, I'm not worried too much about ultimate performance of my rockets, so "regular" rail guides are fine for most of my stuff. Like I said I gravitate toward "scale" looks. But one of the things that makes rocketry so much fun are the innumerable little problems to solve, and the innumerable ways to solve them.
I have a potential project I'm considering that would present some real challenges as far as getting it on a rail for launch. It would be a high power scale model of the Sprint missile, which is completely conical (pic below). I have a few ideas (none that I really like), but I would really love to see what you guys might come up with! I don't want to hijack this thread, so I'll start a new one over in high power.
On second thought, I'll post it here in the Rocketry Watering Hole...
Would be very interested in a brain-storming session. Any and all ideas welcome!
View attachment 644508
Is it a cluster? Will it be fast off the pad? If yes to both, put a square tube that fits over a rail up the middle of the rocket on centerline. If the rocket is long enough and/or liftoff acceleration is high enough, the rail doesn’t even need to come out the top of the rocket.This is a fun thread! I'm really liking all of the different ideas that have been presented.
Generally, I'm not worried too much about ultimate performance of my rockets, so "regular" rail guides are fine for most of my stuff. Like I said I gravitate toward "scale" looks. But one of the things that makes rocketry so much fun are the innumerable little problems to solve, and the innumerable ways to solve them.
I have a potential project I'm considering that would present some real challenges as far as getting it on a rail for launch. It would be a high power scale model of the Sprint missile, which is completely conical (pic below). I have a few ideas (none that I really like), but I would really love to see what you guys might come up with! I don't want to hijack this thread, so I'll start a new one over in high power.
On second thought, I'll post it here in the Rocketry Watering Hole...
Would be very interested in a brain-storming session. Any and all ideas welcome!
View attachment 644508
Some of my Unistrut button designs:
View attachment 644645
View attachment 644641
View attachment 644642
View attachment 644643
View attachment 644644
View attachment 644646
I would love to see them.Hey! I have done limited runs of that Uni-Strut Airfoil guide. I have some new ones coming that I was hoping to get the design complete and have a few prototypes at LDRS but my time is running out. It would be real exciting for this thread, hope to have something soon
View attachment 644654
Enter your email address to join: